a simple cycle without any condition

[GamBIT]

Hello!

A little but useful request.
Please make a simple cycle without any condition. For not to make the cycles like 'cycle for 999999999'
It is a common case when we need a simple cycle to run a program with no time or optional limitations. Always.
Now we have to invent some conditions that would not ever happen, but why..

It could be easily done in the cycle's dialogue with the 4-th string [no condition] plus to the 3 existing.

Thanks!

 

[Dm114]

Hello!

A little but useful request.
Please make a simple cycle without any condition. For not to make the cycles like 'cycle for 999999999'
It is a common case when we need a simple cycle to run a program with no time or optional limitations. Always.
Now we have to invent some conditions that would not ever happen, but why..

It could be easily done in the cycle's dialogue with the 4-th string [no condition] plus to the 3 existing.

Thanks!

If used in a loop be careful of endless loops.

There is very simple way to do what are looking. You can use a condition like Battery level<0 that would never happen.

I use the condition Battery level>0 in a loop to allow this part of the macro either to Continue (restart the loop from the beginning) or Break from loop (exit this loop and continue the rest of the macro) at any time, depending on conditions during execution. It's a kind of convenient GoTo statement.

 

[GamBIT]

If used in a loop be careful of endless loops.

There is very simple way to do what are looking. You can use a condition like Battery level<0 that would never happen.

I use the condition Battery level>0 in a loop to allow this part of the macro either to Continue (restart the loop from the beginning) or Break from loop (exit this loop and continue the rest of the macro) at any time, depending on conditions during execution. It's a kind of convenient GoTo statement.

Thanks for your warning but I'm always careful.
You have written the same with me. I always use some fake conditions just to make a cycle be running. And it's a little bit annoying.
Honestly I wonder why there's not done the most primitive case of the cycles - 'no condition cycle'. For ex, almost any С-projects are running inside a void endless cycle.

 

[Endercraft]

So like

while (true) {
   // do something
}

 

[GamBIT]

I just suggest make an option 'no condition' to a standard dialogue of creating a cycle. Without need to program smth on Java.

 

[mapriex]

So like

while (true) {
   // do something
}

here you have the 'true' condition

someone needs to explain me how can i make loops without conditions.

 

[mapriex]

I just suggest make an option 'no condition' to a standard dialogue of creating a cycle. Without need to program smth on Java.

you can make a conditon with a static question true == true. maybe for better readibility you can use a local variable 'endlessloop' (set to true) == true.

 

[Endercraft]

here you have the 'true' condition

someone needs to explain me how can i make loops without conditions.

If there is a new option to make infinite loops in many languages it will just do the same while true.

 

[GamBIT]

here you have the 'true' condition

someone needs to explain me how can i make loops without conditions.

Yes, you need someone.

void loop(){

}

 

[GamBIT]

I ask the developer simply add an option 'no condition' in the DO / WHILE cycling command.
Just to make programming easier, not doing some strange fake conditions for only do the same 'no condition cycle'.

 

[Endercraft]

Just like
for {
// code here
}
in Go.
Anyway this would be a good addition because to less experienced users using "true = true" in a condition might not make sense (assuming they even come up with that idea).