Okay. I'm guessing you mean the built-in one to macrodroid. that doesn't seem to be the problem right now. Like I replied to below I had a friend text messaged me with the word find. He did and it sent me the word fine but also Three Links to my location and sent him nothing in reply to his word find. This is really weird why it's not sending the location to the sender of the message but it's sending the location to my phone that the script is running on.You may use the notification reply action to skip the notification listener plugin entirely.
You may use the notification reply action to skip the notification listener plugin entirely.
Okay. I'm guessing you mean the built-in one to macrodroid. that doesn't seem to be the problem right now. Like I replied to below I had a friend text messaged me with the word find. He did and it sent me the word fine but also Three Links to my location and sent him nothing in reply to his word find. This is really weird why it's not sending the location to the sender of the message but it's sending the location to my phone that the script is running on.You may use the notification reply action to skip the notification listener plugin entirely.
Okay so I had a friend of mine text me from his number on his phone with the word find. When he did that I got his text with the word find but in the same text I got three links to my location. He got nothing bounced back to him with my location he got no response at all. So this takes the text now application out of the equation.I am unable to use the text now app at my location. I think you need to adjust it to your environment.
The reply is only to the notification, so if the notification is not displayed, such as when the message app is open, the reply will not be made.
If you mean can I text my friend with text now and he will receive the text and reply to me and it will come back to me in the text now app only, and the same thing from the text app operating on my real phone number, then the answer is yes. They both operate independently of each other.Have you tested that the original number and the text now number can send and receive SMS completely independently?
I can't test text now so I have no way to verify this.
It sure does look like I'm sending it to null. Do you think it's a bug or the way my script is written? Should I try to capture the call number in a local variable and then use that local variable to send the SMS to? Do I need an if/then statement that says when a trigger is fired from an incoming call then send the SMS?At first glance it seems you are sending an SMS to "null".
View attachment 6063
For me it doesn't send the SMS at all..
The log is not cut off, these are all entries.
Oh actually I got the same thing as you. It's a bug then.
View attachment 6064
[sms_number]
.I'm not sure I understand. Because this macro is based off of an incoming call. There is no incoming SMS number. Unless you're saying have the trigger be an incoming SMS. But I've already tried that. I'm probably not understanding. This latest script recognizes that there's an incoming call. And I would hope that it recognizes the incoming call number.Instead of select contact -> Incoming call num try Select number ->[sms_number]
.
Okay thank you. I'll try in a little bit. I was going to come back and reply and add to that, that it seems like I'm having multiple problems. So if I could get somebody to write a simple one that works for them that would be great. Because then I can try it and narrow it down to permission problems or whatever that I'm having on my device and figure it out from there. Because with all the stuff I'm trying I don't know if it's just a bad script that I'm writing or a problem with my device. I'll try this latest from you and see what happens.With the macro you wrote, I too got null and could not send SMS.
With a slightly modified macro, I was able to send SMS.
If it doesn't work with this macro, I think it depends on the environment of your device.
[call_number]
and not [sms_number]
.I'm using it with 5.18 something. I know it's an older version but it was working with this before.Oh yeah sorry I got confused it is indeed[call_number]
and not[sms_number]
.
At this point I have no idea how it doesn't work. What version are you using ?